I don’t know what Jeff is talking about Cryptograms for. Aren’t those sweet crackers for mummies? Or maybe witches. No, that would be Hexagrams. Maybe Hexagrams are only for chinese witches. Tetragrams are for fish. Or maybe those are Teddy Grams. I wonder if that’s the unit of measure Roosevelt proposed?
Oh well, thanks to those stalwart readers that are putting up with this silliness.
Isn’t stalwart something like Compound W? Or maybe just something you get at a really dirty flea market.
Okay, I’ll stop now.
Tune in tomorrow. Some bat-time some bat-channel.
Bookmark to:
Amanda | 05-Apr-07 at 3:20 pm | Permalink
Oh. Dear. Can you imagine if we really had to measure distances in Teddy Grams? All those cookies laid end-to-end would make counting impossible. We’d have to go metric, but then we’d have kilograms, and we’d end up baking cakes with flour measured by weight from Indianapolis to Chicago. ooohh — it hurts my poor, tender head.
jeff | 05-Apr-07 at 6:22 pm | Permalink
No, no, Teddy Grams would have to be a measure of weight.
Given that, many people’s lives would be less stressful and possibly more fun…you don’t have to focus on pounds, but on Teddy Grams. Lose Teddy Grams, with our new diet program… the ability to brag, “I’ve lost 2,500 Teddy Grams this week alone.”
Amanda | 05-Apr-07 at 8:14 pm | Permalink
I lost 2500 Teddy Grams once — I had a little gambling problem in elementary school.